In the tests, each participant was given two silhouettes to modify - one that represented themselves, and one that represented the body shape of their ideal mates. Each member was granted freedom - no worried loved ones looking over their shoulders - to alter the ideal mate silhouette to whatever looked most attractive to them. The researchers then took the dimensions of the idealized silhouettes and compared them against the measurements taken from the participants and their actual mates.
The findings break down as follows:
- The men's ideal mates were generally significantly slimmer and slightly taller, thus having lower BMIs (body mass index)
- The women's ideal mates were slightly larger and a little taller, with similarly proportioned BMIs
(Dreamy.) |
What's troubling, however, is that the preferred silhouette that the men drew had an average BMI of 18.4, just below the cut-off for being officially underweight by the standards of the World Health Organization. Women drew silhouettes with an average BMI of 23.5, well within range and for their partners.
While the study can do little to tease out the cause of these disparities, it's easy to let speculation lead us astray. There weren't many controls in the experiment, and there aren't other similar tests that compare both mate preference and mate choice, so it's hard to draw any solid conclusions.
What the researchers did conclude is that mate preference is a poor predictor of mate choice. Basically, you're not likely to end up dating the body of your dreams. Perhaps it's best to focus your preferences on non-physical attributes then, eh?
I'd want exactly what my spouse looks like. OK, well... may be a little taller. :)
ReplyDelete